Jarrett released

Anything and everything related to Barnet FC

Jarrett released

Postby Agewills » 29 Mar 2011, 16:05

Just seen that Albert Jarrett has been released from Lincoln - contract terminated by mutual consent.

Would be able to sign him as a free agent?

I would take him back, thought he did well for us - used to put in a ton of crosses every game.
Agewills
 
Posts: 494
Joined: 18 Mar 2011, 10:00

Re: Jarrett released

Postby jerroll » 29 Mar 2011, 16:16

no we cannot - he was under contract to lincoln when the window closed on January 31
jerroll
 
Posts: 9387
Joined: 23 Jan 2011, 17:25

Re: Jarrett released

Postby wonderbee » 29 Mar 2011, 16:49

Agewills wrote:Just seen that Albert Jarrett has been released from Lincoln - contract terminated by mutual consent.

Would be able to sign him as a free agent?

I would take him back, thought he did well for us - used to put in a ton of crosses every game.


You know it's been a terrible season when you get all misty eyed about Albert Jarrett.

Yes he put in a lot of crosses, but like Marshall, most of them ended up in the stand.
User avatar
wonderbee
 
Posts: 132
Joined: 08 Feb 2011, 22:27
Location: Bounds Green

Re: Jarrett released

Postby becbee » 29 Mar 2011, 16:55

According to Jerroll on the Simon King thread, we couldn't sign him even if we wnted to because he was contracted to a FL side at the transfer deadline.
becbee
 
Posts: 7599
Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 11:43

Re: Jarrett released

Postby wonderbee » 29 Mar 2011, 17:23

becbee wrote:According to Jerroll on the Simon King thread, we couldn't sign him even if we wnted to because he was contracted to a FL side at the transfer deadline.


And this thread too. My point was that even if we could sign him, he wouldn't be the solution.
User avatar
wonderbee
 
Posts: 132
Joined: 08 Feb 2011, 22:27
Location: Bounds Green

Re: Jarrett released

Postby Mickbee » 29 Mar 2011, 23:43

Yeah, lets hold out for Arron Lennon. Just who do people think we are capable of attracting? I know we can't sign him but i thought he was one of the players we should have kept hold of from last season. He would have provided cover / an alternative to MM.
Mickbee
 
Posts: 1115
Joined: 25 Jan 2011, 22:36

Re: Jarrett released

Postby Evanstribe » 30 Mar 2011, 00:46

People always say that Jarrett couldnt cross, but I personally think the complete opposite; i always remember his crosses looking very dangerous, the only problem was that we had no one to get on the end of them! If we'd had better strike options then furlong last season, im sure we would rate Jarrett a lot higher nowadays. Id like to see him back, I thought he was a decent winger at this level - certainly if were playing the conference next season.
Evanstribe
 
Posts: 357
Joined: 26 Jan 2011, 16:14

Re: Jarrett released

Postby djhdjh » 30 Mar 2011, 16:17

Marshall is more direct, has more pace, is more consistently dangerous at beating players and has scored more goals. If we go down it is not because we lacked a good left winger. As for next season, maybe if we lose Marshall but even then the likes of Holmes and Vilhete will continue our tradition of good wingers without Jarrett - some decent crossing and alright at this level but hardly brilliant.
djhdjh
 
Posts: 548
Joined: 22 Jan 2011, 12:53

Re: Jarrett released

Postby Welshbee » 30 Mar 2011, 18:15

Cannot believe anyone would be even suggesting we bring back that useless waste of space to rob more wages from this football club! TALENTLESS (well, not in fact, but for effect, the fact he suggested, at times, hints of talent made him even more frustrating).
www.downhillsecondhalf.co.uk - the best of all the websites.
User avatar
Welshbee
 
Posts: 103
Joined: 30 Mar 2011, 17:46


Return to General Barnet Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests